Abhijit A. Mahabal skribis 2004-05-04 10:27 (-0500): > As I try writing P6 programs I do find myself needing required named > params, and I thought I'd like something like ++$named_req for myself as a > shorthand for "+$named_req is required" or whatever is decided.
What's wrong with just specifying them as positional ones? Don't document the feature and you'll effectively have required named parameters. Or am I missing something? > "the entire P6 grammar" Are parts already available in Perl 6 rule syntax? Juerd
