Jeff Clites <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's another tiny patch, to let us fast-fail string_equal if we have > cached hashval's which don't match.
What about a hash value collision? leo
Jeff Clites <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's another tiny patch, to let us fast-fail string_equal if we have > cached hashval's which don't match.
What about a hash value collision? leo