On 4/19/04 3:36 PM, Larry Wall wrote: > On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 02:04:55PM -0400, John Siracusa wrote: > : So, how about "Perl6opaque" (or "Perl6Opaque"), just to be safe :) > > How 'bout just "Opaque", meaning Parrot's native object type, or whatever > the native opaque type is for the platform in question. > > But I really don't care, as long as I have the 0 shortcut.
I'm disappointed that you didn't suggest 0paque ;) I'm fine with Opaque too. I just object to needless (and possibly ambiguous) abbreviation. -John
