Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Or something equally manager-speaky.
Ok all ...
*) Fix hash.c. (Though it may not be broken. Signs are good, though)
which indications do you have that something is broken here?
I'm not sure, but folks have been reporting odd errors when working with lexical pads, ordered hashes, and hashes in general. It's possible that this is all independent, or indicative of a problem elsewhere, but they all share the hash.c code, so it seems a good place to look.
Might be a red herring, of course, but we certainly would be well-served by giving that code a good going over, as even small speedups would give us a good boost...
--
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
