Dan wrote: > At the moment I'm thinking of the load path as an array of subs that > get passed in the file being looked for and return... something. I'm > not sure what, though.
Don't reinvent the wheel here. Obviously what should be return is an URI. If we start off only supporting "file://..." okay, but eventually we should support full over-the-net URI's (http:, https:, ftp:, etc.). -- Mark Biggar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
