I began a little piece of this ages ago- attempting to translate the parts 
that identify the platform ($^O, essentially) from metaconfig to something 
we could put into Configure.pl.

Even that relatively simple chore wasn't too easy.  I should still have 
the work-in-progress code for that around here somewhere.

--Josh


At 19:47 on 03/16/2004 EST, Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hey folks.
> 
> Now that we're integrating in with perl 5, a few things are becoming 
> really obvious.
> 
> First, we really need to work on the embedding interface. Memory 
> handling, signals, and I/O are the biggies there. Working on that, 
> though not fast enough for Arthur.
> 
> Second, we're running over the same problems in system configuration 
> that perl (and python, and ruby, for that matter) have already run 
> across. Moreover, we're making the same decisions, only... 
> differently. This is silly both because we're re-inventing the wheel 
> and we're making the wheel with metric nuts instead of english.
> 
> We could go dig through perl's configure every time we add a new 
> environment probe, but that'll get really old really quick. Instead, 
> what I'd like is for someone (Oh, Brent... :) to go through perl's 
> configure and dig out the tests in it, as well as the defaults that 
> it has and just get all the config variables in once and for all. 
> While some of what's in there we don't have to deal with (joys of C89 
> as a minimum requirement) there's a lot of hard-won platform 
> knowledge in there and ignoring it's foolish.
> -- 
>                                          Dan
> 
> --------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
> Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]                         have teddy bears and even
>                                        teddy bears get drunk


Reply via email to