Hi, On Thursday 18 March 2004 22:38, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > At 4:10 PM -0500 3/18/04, Mitchell N Charity wrote: > >>It seemed nontrivial to reduce the number return continuation pmc's > >>used in oofib.imc. So I instead added an _extra_, unused one, to the > >>two already used in each fib method. > >> > >>Parrot ran 30% slower. (Optimized, unoptimized, and jit) > >> > >>Which suggests return continuation pmc driven memory management costs > >>(gc and allocation) are currently a major, perhaps even dominant, > >>factor in method invocation speed. > > > > Yow. Okay, thanks. That means it's time to dive into the think tank > > and see what we can do about that. > > Which brings up again my warnocked question: How can return > continuations get reused? Please provide some PASM code that enables my > brain to follow your argument that we cant't simply cache them. See attachment.
> leo jens
