On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Dan Sugalski wrote: > At 10:03 AM -0500 2/26/04, Simon Glover wrote: > >On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Dan Sugalski wrote: > > > >> >like t/pmc/objects.t? > >> > >> I was waiting for you to pull that out. :) Yes, objects.t assumes > >> some evil low-level knowledge of the internals. > > > > Well, in part that's because classoffset wasn't implemented when I > > started writing the tests, so I had to use absolete offsets. Do you > > want me to rework it to be less evil? > > Yeah, I think that'd be a good idea. I've this nasty feeling that > sometime between 0.1.0 and 0.1.2 someone's going to end up adding in > more attributes at runtime to the base object class...
OK, the object tests now use relative offsets throughout. Simon
