[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aaron Crane) writes: > One option might be an 'rsort' function, but I think that's somewhat lacking > in the taste department.
Agreed. > Another might be as simple as > > @unsorted ==> sort ==> reverse ==> @sorted; @sorted <== sort <== @unsorted, no? ;) > @unsorted ==> sort &rinfix:cmp ==> @sorted; > > That is, rinfix: (or some other name) is like infix:, but gives you a > function that reverses its arguments before actually running the operator. > Perhaps it could even be implemented as a macro. I like this; it reminds me of the games you have to play with determining what do to with binary operators whose operands are overloaded in different classes. -- Do not go gentle into that good night/Rage, rage against the dying of the light
