Hello,
While looking at Chromatic's anim_parrot_logo.imc (in examples/sdl), I
was wondering why the includes weren't at the same place. Indeed, the
source reads:
.sub _main
_init()
_MAIN()
end
.end
.include "library/sdl_types.imc"
.pcc_sub _init prototyped
.include "library/sdl.pasm"
.pcc_begin_return
.pcc_end_return
.end
Why does:
.sub _main
_init()
_MAIN()
end
.end
.include "library/sdl_types.imc"
.include "library/sdl.pasm"
fails with:
error:imcc:parse error, unexpected PARROT_OP, expecting $end
in file 'library/sdl.pasm' line 1
included from '../tmp/foo.imc' sub '_new_SDL_Image' line 10
And two more imcc questions:
- why using .pcc_sub instead of .sub? What is the difference? Which is
best/should be used?
- isn't there a kind of "return" imcc op instead of .pcc_begin_return /
.pcc_end_return. I found the .return imcc op in imcc/README but it
fails with "error:imcc:parse error, unexpected '\n'". Is it to be used
only when returning something (ie, returning nothing isn't allowed?)
Thank you for the answers,
Jérôme
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
