Re: Determining PMC memory addresses

[Dan Sugalski]

At 9:18 AM -0700 12/3/03, Cory Spencer wrote:
 > We're already using 'eq' to perform equality testing, and in the interests
 of maintaining a consistent design I would choose to stick with something
 eq-related as opposed to changing it to 'same'.
 eqaddr/eqval?  eq_addr/eq_val?  eq_address/eq_value?
So just to follow up on this thread, was there any preference at all for
the name of the opcode performing equality testing of PMC memory
addresses?  I needed the functionality for the code I'm working on, so
I've created a patch implementing an "eq_addr" opcode...
Make it eq_addr. We'll go with that scheme for the other comparisons 
(eq_str, eq_num) as well.
--
                                        Dan

--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                         have teddy bears and even
                                      teddy bears get drunk