* Smylers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-20 11:50]:
> This, however, is irritating:
>
> my @new = map { s:e/$pattern/$replacement/; $_ } @old;
>
> I forget the C<; $_> far more often than I like to admit and
> end up with an array of integers instead of modified strings.
> So I'd like a more elegant way of writing that -- but I don't
> think making the return value of C<s///> more complicated (and
> duplicating data in the process) would be a nett gain.
s:e/$pattern/$replacement/ for my @new = @old;
But that without nested for modifiers (will those work?) this
isn't be applicable in the middle of a map map map map chain..
--
Regards,
Aristotle
"If you can't laugh at yourself, you don't take life seriously enough."
