On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 12:23:19PM -0500, Potozniak, Andrew wrote: > Is anyone going to develop this, or is all of this just > wishfull/theorhetical thinking?
Boy, that sounds like a volunteer if I ever heard one! Anyhow, it looks like Test::LongString is what you want. Now say thank you to Rafael. :) > If someone will develop this are we going to add it to Test::More What's this "we" stuff, bub? :) No new functions are going into Test::More. The interface is pretty much done. This is ok because... > or create a module wrapped around Test::More with the added functionality? ...you don't write wrappers around Test::More. You use the same underlying class Test::More does: Test::Builder. This includes, oddly enough, like()! -- Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/ Do not try comedy at home! Milk & Cheese are advanced experts! Attempts at comedy can be dangerously unfunny!