Pete Lomax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > New to this list, so please excuse any glaring stupidity.
Welcome here. > I'd be interested to see what sort of signature changes between > compile and runtime you think are likely to happen, as I have to admit > I have never encountered such a beast. Doesn't that force > non-prototyped calls? *Me* thinks, Dan is considering calling into old and possibly outdated libraries. Trying to catch such errors at subroutine level seems strange. > procedure fred(integer x, string y) > _u_fred: > I5=P3[1] > S5=P3[2] > _fred: There is no P3[] involved. "_fred" just starts with whatever is in registers I5/S5. > For optional parameter handling, I will do something like: Please read my proposal WRT default params posted elsewhere in this thread. The default value could be the result of an arbitrary expression, so its not that simple. > Pete leo
