Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > YHO would be incorrect here. There's a lot of runtime mutability, and > there's no guarantee that a sub or method has the same prototype at > runtime that it did at compiletime.
*if* the pdds allow such weirdness with native types. Can we define another property for such calls: .sub _weird prototyped check_args I still think, that the *common* case (i.e. fixed and known arguments on both sides) should be as fast as possible. > Dan leo
