Thanks. 'bout time, I suppose, since even _I_ have stopped using prd-perl6.pl...
/s [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joseph F . Ryan) writes: > # New Ticket Created by Joseph F. Ryan > # Please include the string: [perl #24403] > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > # <URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=24403 > > > > Just a simple consistancy patch; as perl6 itself becomes more complex, > there is a greater chance of a program running differently compared > to prd-perl6. > > - Joe > > > -- attachment 1 ------------------------------------------------------ > url: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/attach/67019/50015/e2e3d9/TestCompiler.diff > > --- parrot/languages/perl6/P6C/TestCompiler.pm~ Sun Nov 2 15:06:26 2003 > +++ parrot/languages/perl6/P6C/TestCompiler.pm Sun Nov 2 15:06:26 2003 > @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ sub generate_pbc_for { > my $pbc_f = Parrot::Test::per_test('.pbc',$count); > my $parrot = "..$PConfig{slash}..$PConfig{slash}parrot$PConfig{exe}"; > > - Parrot::Test::_run_command("$PConfig{perl} prd-perl6.pl --batch=$p6_f --imc", > 'STDOUT' => $imc_f, 'STDERR' => $err_f); > + Parrot::Test::_run_command("$PConfig{perl} perl6 $p6_f --imc", 'STDERR' => > $err_f); > Parrot::Test::_run_command("$parrot -o $pasm_f $imc_f", 'STDERR' => $err_f); > my $pasm; > {
