Thanks.  'bout time, I suppose, since even _I_ have stopped using
prd-perl6.pl...

/s

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joseph F . Ryan) writes:

> # New Ticket Created by  Joseph F. Ryan 
> # Please include the string:  [perl #24403]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. 
> # <URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=24403 >
>
>
> Just a simple consistancy patch; as perl6 itself becomes more complex,
> there is a greater chance of a program running differently compared
> to prd-perl6.
>
> - Joe
>
>
> -- attachment  1 ------------------------------------------------------
> url: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/attach/67019/50015/e2e3d9/TestCompiler.diff
>
> --- parrot/languages/perl6/P6C/TestCompiler.pm~       Sun Nov  2 15:06:26 2003
> +++ parrot/languages/perl6/P6C/TestCompiler.pm        Sun Nov  2 15:06:26 2003
> @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ sub generate_pbc_for {
>      my $pbc_f  = Parrot::Test::per_test('.pbc',$count);
>      my $parrot = "..$PConfig{slash}..$PConfig{slash}parrot$PConfig{exe}";
>  
> -    Parrot::Test::_run_command("$PConfig{perl} prd-perl6.pl --batch=$p6_f --imc", 
> 'STDOUT' => $imc_f, 'STDERR' => $err_f);
> +    Parrot::Test::_run_command("$PConfig{perl} perl6 $p6_f --imc", 'STDERR' => 
> $err_f);
>      Parrot::Test::_run_command("$parrot -o $pasm_f $imc_f", 'STDERR' => $err_f);
>      my $pasm;
>      {

Reply via email to