Michael Carman said: > On 10/31/2003 8:08 AM, Andy Lester wrote: >> >> Personally, I find the POD useful when I'm going thru a Devel::Cover run. >> I interleave POD with functions and I like to refer to my docs. > > Well, since POD is intended to be documentation (not code or even comments) > it seems reasonable to omit it from a coverage report. That said, if I can > find a clean way to make it an option, I'll do so.
That's what the -option option of cover is for, options which are specific to a particular report. Whatever is in there gets passed in to the report() method of the reporter module. None of the reports use that feature at the moment, so it is just possible that things might not work exactly as they should, but the infrastructure is in place. -- Paul Johnson - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pjcj.net
