> Is it worth trying to agree on a de facto standard name for
> such a beast: 99-pod.t/99_pod.t/99.pod.t/99pod.t?

Personally, I'd just as soon not have it be one of the numeric ones.  It
doesn't matter what order it's run in.

xoa
-- 
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance

Reply via email to