On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Put them *back*, please, unless you're going to fix core.pm.
>
> Done. op2pm.pl now has the renumbering. Its simpler and cleaner.
>
> Now, that 1237 opcodes are fixed numbered, shall we remove the
> finger-printing? Currently we just don't read PBCs, when the
> finger-print (generated from core.pm) doesn't match.
We should keep the fingerprinting, since we can still have an issue where
new bytecode can't run on old interpreters, but it's probably time to take
another look at how we set the fingerprint.
Dan
