Gregor N. Purdy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there any good reason why prototyped PCC subs > shouldn't be callable with IMC syntax that looks like > a macro call, without having to make a macro wrapper > manually?
Could be done, but for sure unlikely. PASM/PIR are still assembler languages. You can stuff features and more into it, but this is not the goal. The assembler syntax should be simple and easy to generate from HLL compilers. It should of course have support for all the features of the underlying CPU (parrot), but not much more. You are AFAIK generating PIR files by perl, so just spit out the function call, that's it. leo
