On Sep-18, Steve Fink wrote: > On Sep-18, Gregor N. Purdy wrote: > > I really don't think we should ship with broken examples. They > > should be fixed or removed if it isn't worth it... > > Ah! Sorry, I misunderstood. I'll take a quick look at them now. > Thanks!
Ok, they're "fixed". The IO examples shouldn't have seg faulted, but they were feeding bad IO PMCs to their read ops. I added a (skipped) test to check for them doing the right thing. Except that the expected output in that test is wrong, but I don't know what the exception test should look like.
