Michal Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Out of curiosity, why does ~ map to both > unary bitwise-not and binary bitwise-xor > in imcc?
> I was expecting xor to be ^ and ^^ Perl6ism at some time IIRC. I stopped following the various operator threat^Hds in p6l. But if they are fixed, we should probably go with Perl6 operators, because they are more complete. Is there a summary somewhere? > Sincerely, > > Michal J Wallace leo
