On Tue, 5 Aug 2003, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 12:18 PM +0200 8/5/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > >Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Here's some stuff we need to add to the packfile format and the sub > >> header to get things ready for more language work. > > > >First: any changes here imply, that assemble.pl/disassemble.pl will > >seeze to work. So first step would be: grep the tree and remove all > >traces of these programs. > > I'm fine with assemble.pl in its current incarnation going away. I'd > prefer to keep disassemble.pl, or at least *some* disassembler, > around. I'm not sure if we want to build disassembly functionality > into Parrot. (Mainly for size of executable issues--I'm fine with > shipping a disassembler as part of the parrot kit, as well as having > the disassembler as a loadable library) Well, there's disassemble.c, which pdb uses; does that do everything that you want? Simon
