Togos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > add(out PMC, in PMC, in PMC)
> add!(in PMC, in PMC, in PMC) While that is all fine and useful, we would need that for e.g. keyed set and get too (store/get a reference or value). So that would lead to effectively almost doubling our opcode count. This can lead to less code locality and instruction cache misses, which I don't like. leo
