On Wednesday 13 August 2003 05:07, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > I started extending the packfile functions towards multiple code > segments. First is still some cleanup, but I already have troubles with > the EXEC stuff :-(
I could not reproduce the error here. > The debugger doesn't really like this file. Anyway, what assumptions > does EXEC have WRT the packfile, e.g. fixed order first const_table then > bytecode or such? No, it just stores the offset of the bytecode. > What info does EXEC need, to write out the object file? >From the packfile, the offset of the bytecode and the size of constant table. > EXEC should probably get a set of callback functions (s. > pf_register_standard_funcs) for each of the segment types. > > leo Daniel
