At 9:21 PM +0300 8/8/03, Vladimir Lipskiy wrote:
> So, the project. Someone needs to go through the configure procedure
and the headers and throw a PARROT_ prefix in front of all the HAS_
defines we define, so we can avoid this problem.
Some defines have the HAVE_ prefix. Should those be also prefixed?
If they're being set in our configure stuff, yes.
--
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
