On Sun, 3 Aug 2003, Daniel Grunblatt wrote: > On Sunday 03 August 2003 15:27, Simon Glover wrote: > > On 3 Aug 2003, Luke Palmer wrote: > > > This fix has worked fine with JIT until now, so I suspect the problem > > > is elsewhere. > > > > Bug confirmed here (although I need a slightly longer string to trigger > > it). Here's a stacktrace: > > I couldn't reproduce it here, but from your bt I supposed that > jit_info->objfile was getting something (!= NULL) while running under jit, as > it was not initialized correctly, so I fixed that. > Could you confirm if the bug's still there?
No, that seems to have fixed it. Simon
