--- chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday, August 1, 2003, at 05:03 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote:
>
> > Ooooh! I just had a great idea. Use "TEST { ... }" instead of "TEST:
> > { ... }"
> > in Test::AtRuntime.
>
> Could these instead be subroutine attributes? I can see a lot of
> advantages there.
That would be much nicer. I am so used to writing SKIP: {} and TODO: {} that I
scratch my head
and wonder why my cleanup doesn't work in END: {}. The presence or absence of that
little colon
causes me enough grief that I suspect having such a subtle difference as TEST {}
versus TEST: {}
is begging for trouble.
This does mean, though, that it won't play nicely with versions of Perl < 5.6.0. Is
that trade
off acceptable?
Cheers,
Ovid
=====
Silence is Evil http://users.easystreet.com/ovid/philosophy/indexdecency.htm
Ovid http://www.perlmonks.org/index.pl?node_id=17000
Web Programming with Perl http://users.easystreet.com/ovid/cgi_course/
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
