--- Trey Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To take the E6 example of currying &part: > > &List::Part::part.assuming(labels => <<sheep goats>>) > > One had to curry in C<labels> to be the same as it was defined in > C<&part> > originally, i.e. C<< <<sheep goats>> >>. > > What if one wanted to curry in whatever the default is, i.e., > assuming > "nothing" (different from "assuming nothing"), so that if > List::Part::part > changed its default for C<labels> to C<< <<oves caperes>> >>, the > client > code would pick that up?
assuming(labels => undef) > > -- > Trey Harris > Vice President > SAGE -- The System Administrators Guild (www.sage.org) > Opinions above are not necessarily those of SAGE.
