-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 * Randal L. Schwartz <merlyn at stonehenge.com> [2003-07-21 13:21]: > It occurs to me that that if I wanted to build a health check watchdog > for my system (a script that executes at regular intervals to ensure > proper operation), that the Test::* mechanisms would be pretty ideal > for checking the results and reporting the proper errors.
I assume you're asking this because you have a good reason to not use something like mon or cricket, right? (darren) - -- Optimization hinders evolution. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: This message is digitally signed and can be verified for authenticity. iD8DBQE/HCOozsinjrVhZaoRAt/2AJsG4ny0KYaEC5QbpgisTzeRVxXBSACfWz7A 1Q47X/iSV2IvA2KgOYem3UU= =a+k1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
