Sean O'Rourke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 5 Jul 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>> Is there a better way to locate the next entry, either by an integer idx >> or by a key or some other means? > It's constant time if you keep a bucket index and a pointer to the > current hash bucket in the iterator (see e.g. hash.c:hash_clone()). Thanks for the hint. That's it (albeit no pointer because of GC). Done. > /s leo
