At 1:30 PM +0200 6/14/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote:

PMCs are different. Currently many opcodes with PMCs are defined like:


B<add>(inout PMC, in PMC)

This is plain wrong. If the LHS PMC doesn't exist yet, you can't call its add vtable method (The implementations is $1->vtable->add(...)).

You're right. Go ahead and make 'em all in parameters. While contents and type may change, the actual PMC pointer should remain a constant.
--
Dan


--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                         have teddy bears and even
                                      teddy bears get drunk

Reply via email to