On Wed, 2003-05-28 at 11:13, Clinton A. Pierce wrote: > > > >Is there is reason not to s/\.constant/.const/g for consistency's sake? > > And actually, on further consideration, .const isn't what I want > either.
Which doesn't invalidate my question. :-) -- Bryan C. Warnock bwarnock@(gtemail.net|raba.com)
