>Example: > > set I0, 1e20 > end > >Results in: > > (error) line 2: parse error, unexpected IDENTIFIER, expecting >'\n' > Didn't create output asm. >
Should it, though? Although it would be pretty convienient, I think that handling scientific notation would be an unnecessary complication for IMCC, and it would be better handled by the compilers that target it. (As in, the compiler converts scientific notation to decimal form during compilition to IMCC code.)
Not my call. The current assembler does the Right Thing WRT this notation and I'd want numeric constants handled somewhere. :)
