Perhaps this might sound like a foolish suggestion, but...

Wouldn't it be better (for some definition of better) to design our
BigInt type so that we can replace the math engine with a different math
engine?  Eg, so we could plug in GMP, or PARI, or Miracl, etc.?
(With a fallback to our own math code)

Something like Perl5's Math::BigInt does.

That way, if someone has a faster math engine, they can use by simply
changing a configuration option (which backend BigInt will use), rather
than having to change the code which creates the bigints.

-- 
$a=24;split//,240513;s/\B/ => /for@@=qw(ac ab bc ba cb ca
);{push(@b,$a),($a-=6)^=1 for 2..$a/6x--$|;print "[EMAIL PROTECTED]
]\n";((6<=($a-=6))?$a+=$_[$a%6]-$a%6:($a=pop @b))&&redo;}

Reply via email to