--- Damian Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Larry wrote:
>
> > : I agree. As long as it's not C<is slurpy>!
> >
> > Of course not. We're trying to encourage the use of line noise,
> > and discourage the use of the long variants, so the long one would
> > have to be C<is slurpificatious>.
>
> Riiiiiiiiiiight! Thank-you, General Haig.
>
> Of course, C<is variadic> (my own preference for the name of this
> trait) would
> probably have much the same effect. ;-)
my macro sucks() is parsed(/<null>/) { "is slurpificatious" }
=Austin
