Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At 9:24 PM +0000 1/21/03, Piers Cawley wrote: >>Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > Hrm, interesting. Single symbol table for methods and attributes, >>> though that's not too surprising all things considered. That may make >>> interoperability interesting, but I was already expecting that to some >>> extent. >> >>Isn't that, essentially what Perl 6 will have too? > > Nope. Attributes and methods will be very separate. Attributes are > class-private, more or less, so they won't be in the symbol > table.
How private? We are still going to be able to write some kind of serializing tool that won't require tons of per class overloads aren't we? (I'd like such a serializing tool to work at the Parrot level with possible callbacks into object methods). -- Piers
