On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Luke Palmer wrote:

> From: Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> is a fatal error.  I could argue for this to change, as to support
> better readability (and it would).  It's obvious WIM, so why doesn't it
> DWIM (disclaimer: cannot be used as an argument for arbitrary features.
> Is not a slogan.  I repeat, is not a slogan.  :)  ?

But it has such a Johnnie Cochran sound to it: "It's obvious WIM, you must
DWIM".  Language design by catch phrase...

-miko


Miko O'Sullivan
Programmer Analyst
Rescue Mission of Roanoke

Reply via email to