At 10:00 PM -0600 12/27/02, Bruce Gray wrote:
Yeah, I misunderstood--I thought you had those #ifndefs in there to make something visible to the MinGW stuff, not to hide it.[cc'ed to Brent Dax for his specific attention]On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 20:34:33 -0500, "Dan Sugalski" wrote:At 1:22 AM +0000 12/27/02, Bruce Gray (via RT) wrote:The gcc compiler in MinGW (win32) emits warnings for invalid pragmas in win32.h (platform.h). This patch uses '#ifndef __GNUC__' to hide the pragmas from gcc.Nope--there are more compilers that aren't gcc than just MinGW. Is there a MinGW specific #define that can be tested instead?Could you take a second look at the patch? Your comments sound like you think I want to: "hide the pragmas from gcc, but let MinGW see them" when really I want to: "hide the pragmas from gcc (which is the same as MinGW in this case)"
Since those #pragmas are in there for particular compilers, I'd like to find out what #defines are around so we can expose them only to the compilers that care. Brent, can you dig that up?
--
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk