On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 12:13:49PM -0700, Luke Palmer wrote: > [Dks wrote:] > > So...are we intending that types and type safety will be like 'use > > strict' (optional and only on request), or will they be like sigils > > (mandatory, can't be turned off)? Or, perhaps, on by default but able > > to be turned off? > > Optional by request, but not explicit request. If you type a > variable, you're asking for type checking on that variable.
Excellent. That's the best of all worlds. Thanks; I am much relieved. --Dks
