> >I think that it'd also be nice to get some consensus on which format of test > >we should maintain: the table version, or the raw-code version. > > > > I think the consensus when Chromatic brought the subject > up was to use the testing system that Parrot uses; however, > your table version is kinda nice.
I also agree that the table version is nice. However, I wonder how easy it will extend. Right now all we're doing is printing literals and make sure they appear correctly. It may not be so easy when we have to concat 5 strings and interpolate entries. Therefore, I would recommend sticking with the testing system Parrot uses.
