Re: Numeric Types

[Dave Whipp]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Dave Whipp writes:
> > You can rename the types if you want; but properties are a better > representation of constraints than type names: more precise, and more > flexible.
>
but types *are* properties .
arcadi

True :-(

But I think my examples somehow withstand that oversight. Parameterized properties are more expressive than named types.


Dave.