On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 17:56:28 +0000, Joseph F. Ryan wrote:
> Alright, I have the tests done to match this section of the documentation.
> Well, everything except 'bit', since the last time I checked (and this
> could be resolved by now), there was some debate over Boolean types, and
> I know bit was included in this argument. Also, I'm still not sure how
> hashes are supposed to interpolate within strings, and I'm also a bit
> unsure on how &() is supposed to work.
>
> On another note, I redid my string and interpolation tests to conform with
> the Test::More-ish style (including TODO-block tests) that P6C currently
> uses. Let me know if you like that better than what I did in that last
> message I sent.
For the most part, they look fine to me. I'm a little concerned about some of
the numeric tests:
output_is(<<'CODE', <<'OUT', "Simple Floats");
print 4.5;
print 0.0;
print 13.12343
CODE
4.50.013.12343
OUT
I'd be more comfortable with a newline between the numbers, just in case. It's
not an issue in the string tests.
-- c
