At 21:09 on 11/05/2002 GMT, Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 07:45:46PM -0500, Josh Wilmes wrote: > > However, that still assumes we have atexit() everywhere. This appears to > > not be true on SunOS at least- apparently it has on_exit, though. > > IIRC ANSI C89 says that the library provides atexit() > If SunOS doesn't want to be C89 compliant, then I have no qualms about > telling the first SunOS porter that we'd be pleased to accept patches from > *them* to work around it. (And the return value from sprintf in SunOS, if > we need that.) I agree. However, the point is fairly moot.. If we're going to do a Parrot_on_exit, it's just as easy to provide our own Parrot_exit and not need atexit() either.. it's not like atexit() is giving us much at that point. --Josh
