On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 05:46:07AM -0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > cvsuser 02/11/01 21:46:07 > > Modified: include/parrot datatypes.h > Log: > Fixed errors flagged by "make check_source"
Is it sensible to arrange for CVS to refuse to commit C files unless they pass the source check? [I believe that this is technically easy to implement with little effort, but probably undesirable] Can we tinder box files (or auto e-mail blame for every commit that fails?) [I don't know if this can be done without effort] Nicholas Clark -- INTERCAL better than perl? http://www.perl.org/advocacy/spoofathon/
