> Thats ugly, IMO. > > Now this is going to sound wild (probably) and I have not thought too much > about it and there are probably others who can see the pitfalls quicker > then me. But could () be available for hyper operators ? > > I will sit back now and watch the firewaorks, as I wont be in the UK > on Nov 5 :-) > > Graham. > > >
yes if you demand a prefix @a ^(+=) @b where ^ can be replaced (almost ) everything . arcadi .
