Scott Duff wrote:
Actually, I think we need a universal method on scalars that
gives the eigenstates of that value. It might be C<$val.eigenstates>
or maybe just C<$val.states>. The method would work on non-superimposed
values as well, in which cases it would just return a list containing
the value itself.
Sure, but I'd leave the name "eigenstates" just so the casual
programmer knows they're dealing with something from another
universe if they happen to run across it :-)
But they're *not*, that's the point. This stuff just ain't that hard.
It's just set theory with a few interesting behaviour variations
that make it act more like natural English.
Much more on this in the next few posts.
Damian
