In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tom Hughes wrote: > > > You will still get horrible op explosion for a three argument op as > > even if you assume that all PMCs are keyed, there are four key types > > which, with three operands, gives you 64 ops in total. > > No. We would have > set_p_kc > set_p_ki > set_p_kic ... special shortcut set/get, only one key per op allowed > and > op_p_k_p_k ... unary keyed, all k are KEYs > op_p_k_p_k_p_k ... 3 keys bin op, all k are KEYs So now the assembler has to know that set is special and can have all four sorts of keys while the other ops only support dynamic keys? > All 64 combinations would be a horror. Indeed. > But I really vote for a predereferencing like solution. I didn't really understand that part of your previous message, but I don't see what relevance that has to how the assembler decides on the op name to use (and hence how to encode the arguments). Tom -- Tom Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.compton.nu
