On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Sean O'Rourke wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> > Now why that [languages] isn't part of the default build, I don't
> > know.
> None of the stuff in languages/ is part of the default build, and I think
> it should stay that way. It seems like bad form to, by default, build
> parts of a package that the user may not want to use.
Yes, I agree in general. But the down side is that it's neither built nor
tested by most users (including the tinderboxes!). On balance, I think we
should use bad form and build parts that users may not want to use in
order to give them a workout.
--
Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
