Jerome Quelinm wrote: > > In fact, I tried to change S0, and whatever S0 value is (I tried with > > several values: "<", ">", "A", "0", " "), I always get a 60 as its ordinal > > value... > > I forgot to tell you: it doesn't work when I try to change S0 from the test > set. But when I try to put a > set S0, "v" > > just before using the ord instruction, then I get the good behavior. > Of course, I can't use the set, since the char in S0 can be anything in a > real program...
This looks like a COW bug. Try the attached patch (untested). -- Peter Gibbs EmKel Systems
index.patch
Description: Binary data
